How to Help Control Cancer Metastasis with Diet
“How to Control Cancer
Metastasis with Diet” “Metastasis is the leading cause
of cancer-[related death].” Cancer kills because cancer spreads. For example, the five-year
survival rate for women with localized breast cancer
is nearly 99 percent, but that drops to just 27 percent
in those with metastasized cancer. Yet “our ability to effectively
treat metastatic disease has not changed significantly
in the past few decades”. You know things are getting desperate
when there are papers like this: “Targeting Metastasis
with Snake Toxins . . .” Now we do have built-in
defenses, natural killer cells that roam the body killing
off budding tumors, and I have videos on boosting
natural killer cell activity. But as I explained in the last
video, there’s a fat receptor called CD36 that appears to be
essential for cancer cells to spread, and these cancer cells respond
to dietary fat intake. But not all fat. CD36 is upregulated
by palmitic acid, as much as a 50-fold
increase within 12 hours. Palmitic acid is a saturated
fat found in junk food made from palm oil, but it is
most concentrated in meat and dairy. This may explain why if you look at “dietary fat and breast cancer mortality”, there was no difference in risk
of breast-cancer-specific death for women in the highest versus
the lowest category of total fat intake, but you’re about 50 percent more
likely to die of breast cancer if you eat a lot of saturated fat.
The systematic review and
“…meta-analyses [conclude]… that saturated fat intake negatively
impacts upon breast cancer survival.” This may explain why
“intake of high-fat dairy, but not low-fat dairy,
was related to a higher risk of mortality after
breast cancer diagnosis.” If it was the dairy protein,
like casein that was a problem, the skim milk might be even worse; but no, it was the saturated
butterfat, maybe because it triggered that CD36-induced cancer
spreading mechanism. “…Women who consumed one
or more servings per day of high-fat dairy had …
[about a 50] percent higher risk of dying from breast cancer.” We see the same thing with
“dairy intake about prostate cancer survival”.
“…Drinking high-fat milk [appeared to increase] the risk
of dying from prostate cancer by as much as 600 percent in patients
with localized prostate cancer”, but “low-fat milk was not associated
with such an increase in risk.” So, it seemed to be the animal fat,
rather than the animal protein, and this is consistent with
what Harvard researchers found in the United States.
More evidence that the fat
receptor CD36 is involved is “…that the risk of colorectal
cancer for meat consumption increased from [just doubling
risk to octupling risk]”— multiplying the odds of
getting cancer eight-fold for those who carry a
specific type of CD36 gene. So, “Is It Time to Give
Breast Cancer Patients a Prescription for a Low-Fat Diet?” A cancer diagnosis is a “teachable
moment” if there ever was one to motivate people to make
changes to their lifestyle, but the provision of evidence-based
guidelines are essential and you don’t know…
until you put it to the test. “A randomized, prospective,
multicenter clinical trial to test the effect of a
dietary intervention designed to reduce fat intake in
women with resected, early-stage breast cancer…”
(meaning the women had their breast cancer surgically removed and
were praying it doesn’t come back.) The dietary intervention group
dropped their fat intake from about 30 percent of calories
down to 20 percent of calories, dropped saturated fat
intake about 40 percent and maintained that 40 percent
lower intake after one year, three years, and five years. And…
“After approximately five years of follow-up, [the] women in
the dietary intervention group had a 24 percent lower risk of relapse…”, a 24-percent lower risk of
the cancer coming back.
That was the WINS study, the Women’s
Intervention Nutrition Study. Then there was the Women’s Health
Initiative study, where again, women were randomized to
drop their fat intake down to about 20 percent of
calories, and again, those in the dietary intervention
the group experienced increased breast cancer survival, meaning
“a dietary change may be able to influence breast cancer outcome[s].” And not only was breast cancer
survival significantly greater; the women also experienced a
reduction in heart disease and a reduction in diabetes
as a little side bonus.
http://flywait.unexplain.hop.clickbank.net $9.⁹⁹ / mo. $8.⁹⁹ / mo. Billed $26.⁹⁹
quarterly FOREVER $249.⁹⁹ save $100.⁰⁰
The Unexplainable Store®
ᴀᴜᴅɪᴏ ʙʀᴀɪɴᴡᴀᴠᴇ ꜱᴛɪᴍᴜʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴ ᴀɴᴅ ᴄʀʏꜱᴛᴀʟꜱ
ᵃᵘᵈⁱᵒ ᵇʳᵃⁱⁿʷᵃᵛᵉ ˢᵗⁱᵐᵘˡᵃᵗⁱᵒⁿ ᵃⁿᵈ ᶜʳʸˢᵗᵃˡˢ
The Unexplainable Store – Unleash the power of your brain
Unexplainable Store Experience